Evaluate

Reviews 2016

We strive to annually evaluate the collaboration with all involved partners. Here you see the average score of the evaluation by our partners in 2016. Below you find an overview of all partners who participated in the evaluation in 2016 and who have been a partner for more than one year.

Statistics for the year:

0.0 Organization of Cooperation More details
Number of reviews: 20
1x reviewed with an10
4x reviewed with an9
8x reviewed with an8
5x reviewed with an7
2x reviewed with an6
Average: 7.9
0.0 Quality of education More details
Number of reviews: 19
4x reviewed with an9
11x reviewed with an8
4x reviewed with an7
Average: 8.0
0.0 Adequate knowledge to students More details
Number of reviews: 19
3x reviewed with an9
8x reviewed with an8
1x reviewed with an7.5
7x reviewed with an7
Average: 7.8
0.0 Cooperation last year More details
Number of reviews: 19
1x reviewed with an10
3x reviewed with an9
10x reviewed with an8
4x reviewed with an7
1x reviewed with an6
Average: 7.9

More individual reviews by our partners

Click on a partner name to see the individual reviews about us by our partners.

Acknowledge
Organization of Cooperation 7
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 9
Cooperation last year 8
Average 8
Actemium
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 8
Average 7.8
AmeXio
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 7
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 8
Average 7.5
Brunel
Organization of Cooperation 6
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 8
Average 7.5
Capgemini
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 9
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 9
Average 8.5
CGI
Organization of Cooperation 9
Quality of education 9
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 7
Average 8.3
d-centralize
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 7.5
Cooperation last year 9
Average 8.1
DAF Trucks
Organization of Cooperation 10
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 7
Average 8.3
Eviden
Organization of Cooperation 9
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 9
Cooperation last year 10
Average 9
Fontys Dienst IT
Organization of Cooperation 7
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 9
Average 7.8
Eindhoven
Organization of Cooperation 7
Quality of education 7
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 8
Average 7.3
Info Support
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 7
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 7
Average 7.3
Isah
Organization of Cooperation 7
Quality of education -
Adequate knowledge to students -
Cooperation last year -
Average 7
Jugo
Organization of Cooperation 9
Quality of education 9
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 8
Average 8.3
PeerCode
Organization of Cooperation 7
Quality of education 7
Adequate knowledge to students 7
Cooperation last year 7
Average 7
Prodrive Technologies
Organization of Cooperation 9
Quality of education 9
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 8
Average 8.5
Simac
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 6
Average 7.5
Sioux
Organization of Cooperation -
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 8
Average 8
Sogeti
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 9
Cooperation last year 8
Average 8.3
TweeKracht
Organization of Cooperation 8
Quality of education 8
Adequate knowledge to students 8
Cooperation last year 8
Average 8
Vanderlande
Organization of Cooperation 6
Quality of education -
Adequate knowledge to students -
Cooperation last year -
Average 6